Also, authorities like the state attorney general now have explicit opportunity to file lawsuits against redevelopment plans. Such conditions include, among other things, unsafe and dilapidated buildings and a proliferation of businesses thought to attract crime, such as liquor stores.īy 2007, the law had been tightened up further and the public was given 90 days - 30 days longer than before - to file a lawsuit challenging blight findings. In 1994, California Assembly Bill 1290 tightened up the legal definition of blight, requiring at least one physical and one economic condition of blight. The bad outcomes have led to a tightening of redevelopment law in recent decades, with stricter definitions of what can be considered blight.
There are many stories of agencies either failing to produce their promised results, or worse, becoming hotbeds of corruption. When things go according to this plan, blighted neighborhoods are revitalized and everybody wins.
#Kaleidoscope mission viejo stores free#
Like This Free Civic News? Support Voice of OC Today. Then, if everything goes as planned, property values rise and the increased property taxes are used to pay off the debt. Developers use public money - essentially a free loan - to build and repair infrastructure and make cosmetic fixes to the city’s identified project area. They are conversation pieces in an ongoing debate regarding redevelopment as public policy - when it should happen or whether it should happen at all.Ī redevelopment agency works by funding development projects through public debt. The law has tightened since both projects were approved in the early 1990s, and neither could be built under the same auspices today.
Subscribe to Voice of OC's Free Newsletter The Morning Report Today.
0 kommentar(er)
